Judicial updates-09th Feb 2022 (Income tax, GST & Corporate Laws)

ITAT Kolkata directs service of notice to Assessee’s Lawyer via email as same could not delivered to Assessee

Massive Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) dated 02/02/2022

Revaluation of Land by firm after conversion of inventory into fixed asset – colourable device?

PCIT Vs Orchid Griha Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (Calcutta High Court) dated 31/01/2022

*Tribunal agreed with CIT(A) that after conversion of inventory into fixed asset the firm revalued the developed land including construction thereon in order to bring it in line with the current market value to justify the business assistance secured by the firm from the banks to extent of nearly Rs. 250 crores. Therefore, on facts the tribunal concluded that the revaluation was not a colourable.
Confirmed by HC.

Failure to issue section 143(2) notice prior to finalising reassessment order makes reassessment proceedings a nullity

ACIT Vs P & R Infraprojects Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) dated 07/01/2022

ITAT deletes Addition of Profits from Suppressed of Sales belonging to Firm of director of Appellant Company

ITO Vs Super Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) dated 31/01/2022

Interest on Investment made to acquire controlling interest allowable

Gujarat Nippon Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) dated 01/02/2022

ESIC & PF paid before due date of filing income tax return allowable till AY 2020-21

Dr. B. Lal Clinical Laboratory Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) dated 20/01/2022

Filing of appeal in criminal court against Civil dispute amounts to abuse of process of Court: SC

Jayahari Vs State of Kerala (Supreme Court of India) dated 25/01/2022

CIT(E) Order passed without hearing Assessee during COVID-19 violates Principal of Natural Justice

Madhavi Raksha Sankalpa Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Mumbai) dated 28/01/2022

GST Evasion Case: Accused cannot be Detained in Custody Indefinitely- SC

Paresh Nathalal Chauhan Vs State of Gujarat (Supreme Court of India) dated 01/02/2022

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Paresh Nathalal Chauhan v. The State of Gujarat & Anr. [SLP (Crl) No. 009458 – 009459/2021, Criminal Appeal Nos.164-165/2022 dated February 01, 2022] granted bail to a person accused of tax evasion. Held that, assessee cannot be detained for indefinite period of time when the maximum sentence for such offence is 5 years and investigation w.r.t. the same is still pending.

GST Appellate Authority can provisionally release goods & vehicle- HC

A K Enterprise Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) dated 03/02/2022

ITC available on GST paid under RCM on hiring of buses for transportation of employees

In re Maanicare System India Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) dated 01/02/2022

Matter pending before Competent Jurisdiction cannot be transferred for mere Temporary Shift In Residence

Silpa Shaji Vs Satheesh K.S. (Kerala High Court) dated 01/02/2022

Bar of Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 not applicable to Transactions not in the course of business: SC

Shiv Developers Vs Aksharay Developers (Supreme Court) dated 31/01/2022

Delhi ROC Penalty Order for violation of Section 56(4) of CA 2013 (Non issuance of share certificate to subscriber to MOA within 2 months) in the matter of Raspberry PI Educational Servicrs Pvt. Ltd.

Company Law Adjudication & Appeal Series -05th Feb 2022

Delhi ROC Penalty Order for violation of Section 56(4) of CA 2013 (Non issuance of share certificate to subscriber to MOA within 2 months) in the matter of Raspberry PI Educational Servicrs Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi ROC adjudication order for violation of Section 173(1) for not holding minimum 4 BM in a year & Section 118(10) for non compliances of Secretariat Standard 1 (BM) issued by ICSI in the matter of Midland Credit Management India Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi ROC adjudication order for violation of Section 173(1) for not holding minimum 4 BM in a year & Section 118(10) for non compliances of Secretariat Standard 1 (BM) issued by ICSI in the matter of Midland Credit Management India Pvt. Ltd.


https://youtu.be/JCiCunFSliY

BUDGET 2022 (Download all budget documents) -01st Feb 2022)

Key to Budget Document, 2022

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/Key_to_Budget_Document_2021.pdf

Budget Highlights (Key Features)

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/bh1.pdf

Annual Financial Statement
+

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#collapse2

Memorandum Explaining the Provisions in the Financial Bill

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/memo.pdf

Finance Bill

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/Finance_Bill.pdf

Statements of Fiscal Policy under the FRBM Act, 2003

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/frbm1.pdf

Output Outcome Framework for Schemes 2022-2023

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/OutcomeBudgetE2021_2022.pdf

Customs Notifications
+

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#custom

Implementation of Budget Announcements 2021-2022

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/impbud2020-21.pdf

Budget at a Glance
+

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#budget

Expenditure Profile
+

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#expen

Expenditure Budget

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#expenb

Ministry wise Summary of Budget Provisions

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/eb/sumsbe.pdf

All Statements of Budget Estimates

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/eb/allsbe.pdf

Finance Minister’s Speech

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#collapse1

Judicial updates -21st January 2022

SC in G.T. Girish Vs Y. Subba Raju (D) By LRs judgment dated 18th Jan 2022 held that Subordinate Legislation in the form of Statutory Rules is a ‘law’ u/s 23 of Indian Contract Act


Matter involving large scale State Revenues should be disposed speedily Dalmia Refractories Limited Vs State of Tamil Nadu (Madras High Court) dated 11/01/2022


One Time Settlement (OTS) of Bank Loan is Not a Right of Borrowers held by SC in
matter of Bijnor Urban Cooperative Bank Limited dated 15/12/2021


SEBI impose penalty for dealings in illiquid Stock Options at the BSE In Re Ashok Kumar Sharma HUF (SEBI) -23/12/2021


Taxation

Rajasthan HC disposes Plea seeking extension of due dates till portal Glitches removed

Tax Bar Association Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) dated 12/01/2022

If AO accepts objections of assessee and does not assess or reassess the income which was the basis of notice than he cannot made additions on other issues

Yashoda Shivappa Nagangoudar Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) dated 05/01/2022

Provisional custom duty paid by Assessee cannot be treated as deposit

Nirma Ltd Vs C.C.-Jamnagar(prev) (CESTAT Ahmedabad) dated 13/01/2022

Bombay HC in Vodafone Idea Ltd. Vs ACIT dated 03/01/2022 held-

Reopening of Assessment not permissible to take another view on same material

For legal updates

https://chat.whatsapp.com/KHDvQUZa8yVJXElnuRT8xf

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1994228650711964/?ref=share

Regards,

Bipul Kumar

Tribunals/Quasi-Judicial Bodies

In India, Tribunals are a part of the Executive branch of the Government which are assigned with the powers and duties to act in judicial capacity for settlement of disputes. Part XIV of the Constitution of India makes provisions for establishment and functioning of the Tribunals in India. They are quasi-judicial bodies that are less formal, less expensive and enable speedy disposal of cases.

There are tribunals for settling various administrative and tax-related disputes, including Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), National Green Tribunal (NGT) and Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), among others. Tribunals were added in the Constitution by Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 as Part XIV-A, which has only two articles viz. 323-A and 323-B. Article 323A provides that a law made by the parliament may provide for establishment of an Administrative Tribunal for the Union and a separate Administrative Tribunal for each state or two or more states. Article 323 B empowers the parliament or state legislatures to set up tribunals for matters other than those mentioned under Article 323A.

Types of Tribunal in India

1. Debt recovery Tribunal

The Debt Recovery Tribunals have been constituted under Section 3 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions (RDDBFI) Act, 1993. The original aim of the Debts Recovery Tribunal was to receive claim applications from Banks and Financial Institutions against their defaulting borrowers. (DRT) was established for expeditious adjudication and recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions in order to reduce the non-performing assets of the Banks and Financial Institutions. Prior to the introduction of Debt Recovery Tribunal, petitions had to be filed separately for adjudication of cases and execution proceedings in different courts depending upon their jurisdiction. DRT acts as a single judicial forum for adjudication of cases as well as execution of the decrees passed for recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions under RDDBFI Act and Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests (SARFAESI) Act, 2002.

2. National Company law

Tribunal National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is a quasi-judicial body exercising equitable jurisdiction, which was earlier being exercised by the High Court or the Central Government. It has been established by the Central government under section 408 of the Companies Act, 2013 with effect from 1st June 2016. The Tribunal has powers to regulate its own procedures. The establishment of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) consolidates the corporate jurisdiction of the following authorities:

i)Company Law Board


ii) Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction.

iii) The Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction

iv) Jurisdiction and powers relating to winding up restructuring and other such provisions, vested in the High Courts.

3. Consumer Forum

To protect the rights of the consumers in India and establish a mechanism for settlement of consumer disputes, a three-tier redressal forum containing District, State and National level consumer forums has been set up. The District Consumer Forum deals with consumer disputes involving a value of upto Rs. 1 crore. State Commission has jurisdiction in consumer disputes having a value of upto Rs.10 crore. The National Commission deals in consumer disputes above Rs.10 crores, in respect of defects in goods and or deficiency in service. It is important to note that consumer courts do not entertain complaints for alleged deficiency in any service that is rendered free of charge or under a contract of personal service.

4. Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal (MACT) The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal deals with matters related to compensation of motor accidents victims or their next of kin. Victims of motor accident or legal heirs of motor accident victims or a representing Advocate can file claims relating to loss of life/property and injury cases resulting from Motor Accidents. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal are presided over by Judicial Officers from the State Higher Judicial Service and are under direct supervision of the Hon’ble High Court of the respective state.

5. Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)

Central administrative Tribunal is a multi-member body to hear on cases filed by the staff members alleging non-observation of their terms of service or any other related matters and to pass judgments on those cases. This Tribunal established in pursuance of the amendment of Constitution of India by Articles 323A.

6. National Green Tribunal (NGT)

National Green Tribunal was established for effective and expeditious disposal of cases relating to environmental protection and conservation of forests and other natural resources including enforcement of any legal right relating to environment and giving relief and compensation of damages to persons and property and for related matters.

7. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)

ITAT is a quasi judicial institution set up in January, 1941 and specializes in dealing with appeals under the Direct Taxes Acts. The orders passed by the ITAT are final, an appeal lies to the High Court only if a substantial question of law arises for determination.

Presently ITAT has 63 Benches at 27 different stations covering almost all the cities having a seat of the High Court