More than 3 crore Income Tax Returns filed on new e-Filing portal of Income Tax Department; Taxpayers who are yet to file their ITRs for AY 2021-22 advised to file at the earliest (Press release 05 Dec 2021)

More than 3 crore Income Tax Returns have now been filed on the new e-Filing portal of the Income Tax Department as on 3rd December 2021. The number of ITRs filed per day is over 4 lakh and increasing everyday as the extended due date of 31st December 2021 is approaching.

The Income Tax Department strongly urges all taxpayers to view their Form 26AS and Annual Information Statement (AIS) through the e-filing portal to verify the accuracy of the TDS and Tax Payments and avail of pre-filling of ITRs. It is important for taxpayers to cross check the data in the AIS statement with their Bank passbook, interest certificate, Form 16 and Capital gains statement from brokerages in case of purchase and sale of equity/Mutual funds etc.

Income Tax Return (ITR) filing has increased to 3.03 crore ITRs for AY 2021-22. 58.98% of these are ITR1 (1.78 crore), 8% is ITR2 (24.42 lakh), 8.7% is ITR3 (26.58 lakh), 23.12% are ITR4 (70.07 lakh), ITR5 (2.14 lakh), ITR6 (0.91 lakh) and ITR7 (0.15 lakh). Over 52% of these ITRs are filed using the online ITR form on the portal and the balance are uploaded using the ITR created from the offline software utilities.

The process of e-verification through Aadhaar OTP and other methods is important for the Department to commence processing of the ITR and to issue refunds, if any. It is encouraging to note that 2.69 crore returns have been e-verified, out of which more than 2.28 crore are through Aadhaar based OTP.

In November, 48% of the verified ITRs 1, 2 and 4 have been processed on the same day. Of the verified ITRs more than 2.11 crore ITRs have been processed and over 82.80 lakh refunds for AY 2021-22 have been issued. Taxpayers are urged to ensure that the bank account selected for credit of refund must have their PAN number linked at the bank to avoid refund failures.

Overall 8.33 lakh DSCs have been registered. In the simplified process of DSC registration any individual has to register his DSC only once and can use it across any entity where the individual is a partner, director etc without having to re-register again against each entity or role.

Over 34.01 lakh Statutory Forms have been submitted including 15.11 lakh TDS statements, 1.56 lakh Form 10A for registration of Trusts/institutions, 3.29 lakh Form 10E for arrears of salary, 49,295 Form 35 pertaining to filing of Appeal and 35,342 DTVSV Form 4 till 3rd December, 2021.  Over 7.81 lakh 15CA and more than 1.82 lakh 15CB forms have been filed. More than 29.54 lakh e-PANs have been allotted online free of cost. The Legal Heir functionality has been enabled for registrations and compliance

The Department has been issuing reminders to taxpayers through emails, SMS and media campaigns encouraging taxpayers to file their Income Tax Returns without further delay.

All taxpayers who are yet to file their Income Tax returns for AY 2021-22 are requested to file their returns at the earliest to avoid last minute rush.

Judiciary updates-03rd Dec 2021 (Income tax, GST & Corporate Laws)

Income Tax

Supreme Court dismisses Transfer Petition as withdrawn

 Rajinder Kumar Vs Central Board of Direct Tax & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) dated 15/11/2021

No addition of unaccounted investment if transactions were via Banking Channels

 ITO Vs Vaneet Mittal (ITAT Chandigarh) dated 22/10/2021

Petitioner entitled to avail NIL rate of withholding tax on aircrafts leased to AIL – Delhi HC

Celestial Aviation Trading 64 Limited Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) dated 12/11/2021

No deemed dividend on loan given on interest to Sister Concern for business

TCI Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) dated 02/11/2021

GST

HC directs GST dept to reconsider registration of petitioner as composite dealer instead of regular dealer

Varsha Ritu Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur Bench) dated 08/11/2021

HC Quashed order Cancelling GST Registration without Opportunity of Hearing

 S.S. Traders Vs State of U.P And 3 Others (Allahabad High Court) dated 02/11/2021

IGST Payable on supply of Import services under RCM

 In re GSPC(JPDA)LTD (GST AAR Gujarat) dated 06/09/2021

GST Evasion accused released on regular bail after 2½ years

Manish Vs State of Haryana (Punjab and Haryana High Court) dated 29/10/2021

Corporate Laws

Accident claim benefit available only when accident took place after reviving of policy

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs Sunita (Supreme Court of India) dated 29/10/2021

HC expunges adverse remarks made by Customs Commissioner against an Advocate

 M. S. Srinivasa Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court) dated 10/11/2021

Income Tax Department conducts search operations in Pune, Maharashtra (Ministry of Finance Press Release dated 02 Dec 2021)

The Income Tax Department has initiated search and seizure operations on a leading group of Pune, engaged in dairy farming and milk products, on 25.11.2021.  The search action covered more than 30 premises spread over 6 cities in India.

During the course of search action, several incriminating documents and evidences of tax evasion have been found and seized. The preliminary analysis of these evidence clearly shows evasion of taxable income by adopting various malpractices such as claim of bogus purchases, unaccounted cash sales, cash loan transactions and their repayment, unexplained cash credits, etc. Instances of incorrect claim of loss on account of sale or death of livestock, etc. have also been noticed.

            Evidence has also been gathered revealing that the assesse group has not maintained proper and separate books of account for claiming specific deduction from its taxable income.

The search operation has resulted in the seizure of unaccounted cash and unexplained jewellery of about Rs. 2.50 crore while some bank lockers are yet to be operated. The search action, so far, has led to the detection of unaccounted income of more than Rs. 400 crore.   

Further investigations are under progress.

Income Tax Department conducts search operations on a real estate group in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai Region of Maharashtra (Ministry of Finance Press Release dated 02 Dec 2021)

The Income Tax Department initiated search and seizure operations on a real estate group, engaged in the construction of residential and commercial projects, in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai Region on 25.11.2021. The group is mainly carrying out development of slum rehabilitation projects. The search action covered around 30 premises

The search action unearthed various methods of tax evasion adopted by the group. Several documentary and digital evidences have been found and seized demonstrating receipt of cash to the tune of Rs.100 crore, as part of consideration on sale of flats, which is not accounted for in the regular books of account. The fact of receipt of on- money on such transactions is also corroborated in the statements recorded during the search proceedings. The modus operandi adopted by the group includes issuing of promissory notes equivalent to the on- money component to the customers and these promissory notes are destroyed after registration of the flat.

Incriminating evidence regarding unaccounted cash payments made not only to the original tenants of the slums for vacating the dwelling unit but also to some other persons for facilitating vacation of the properties by slum dwellers has been found and seized. Further evidences suggesting irregularities and violation of guidelines of Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) have also been detected.

The preliminary analysis of evidences revealed that the group has acquired controlling stake in a company by paying consideration in cash. Defaults on compliances to the provisions of tax deduction at source have also been found. The assessee group did not deduct tax at source on certain payments claimed by it which aggregate to more than Rs. 300 crore.

As a result of the search action, unaccounted cash exceeding Rs. 6.00 crore has been seized.

  Further investigations are under progress.

Income Tax Department conducts search operations in Rajasthan (Ministry of Finance Press Release dated 01st Dec 2021)

The Income Tax Department initiated search and seizure operations on a group engaged in manufacturing and export of jewellery and coloured gemstones at Jaipur on 23.11.2021. The search action covered more than 50 premises at different locations in and around Jaipur.

During the course of the search, it was found that the rough of semi-precious and precious stones is imported from African countries and the same is processed in Jaipur. The yield of cut and polished stones is suppressed and part of it is sold in cash, generating unaccounted income which is not recorded in the books of accounts. Such unaccounted income is then deployed to earn interest by providing cash loans through a finance broker. The search team has seized documentary and digital evidences of disbursements of such cash loans and interest earned thereon. The nature of these transactions has been admitted by the finance broker.

Apart from this, incriminating evidences relating to unaccounted sales and purchases, difference in stock, non-genuine unsecured loans and share application money, etc. have also been found. Further, documents have been found from entities of the group operating from Special Economic Zone (SEZ), indicating that they are indulging in unfair practices for declaring higher profits from these units as the income from these units is eligible for exemption u/s 10AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The search action has resulted in seizure of cash of about Rs. 4 crore and jewellery valued at Rs. 9.00 crore. So far, detection of undisclosed income of more than Rs. 500 crore has been made in the group, out of which aggregate amount of Rs. 72 crore has been admitted by the respective group entities as their undisclosed income.

  Further investigations are under progress.

Income Tax Department conducts search operations on two major real estate developers of Ludhiana (Ministry of Finance Press Release 27th Nov 2021)

The Income Tax Department initiated search and seizure operations on two major real estate developers of Ludhiana on 16.11.2021. The search action covered around 40 premises in Ludhiana.

The major finding emanating from these search and seizure operations of both the groups is about the receipt of unaccounted cash by these groups by way of on-money on property transactions. During the course of search proceedings documentary evidences in the nature of ‘agreement to sale’, (popularly known as ‘Biyana’ in local parlance), for certain properties have been found and seized. These documents indicate that the ‘agreement to sale’ for plots has been executed at much higher amount/rate as compared to the consideration disclosed in registered sale deed of the plot. Further, incriminating documents such as loose sheets, excel sheets showing calculation of receipt of on-money of certain property transactions, soft data, chats from mobile phones of the persons concerned, etc. have also been recovered. A preliminary analysis of these evidences clearly indicates the receipt of unaccounted cash by way of on-money on property transactions. Besides, certain other corroborative evidences supporting the receipt of on-money have also been gathered.

Investigations have also revealed that unaccounted cash expenditure has been incurred on construction of residential house of one of the key persons. 

In one of the groups, defaults on compliances for the provisions of tax deduction at source have been detected with regard to payments made to the sellers of the land, etc.

The search action has resulted in seizure of unaccounted cash of about Rs. 2.00 crore besides foreign exchange, and unexplained jewellery of about Rs. 2.30 crore.

  Further investigations are under progress

Guidelines under sub-section (4) of section 194-O, sub-section (3) of section 194Q and subsection (1H) of section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961-reg. (CBDT Circular 20 of 2021 dated 25 Nov 2021)

Finance Act, 2020 inselted a new section 194-o in the Income-tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) which mandates that with elTect from 1st day of October, 2020, an e-commerce operator shall deduct income-tax at the rate of one per cent of the gross amount of sale of goods or provision of services or both, facilitated through its digital or electronic facility or platform. However, exemption from the said deduction has been provided in case of certain individuals or Hindu undivided family subject to fulfilment of specified conditions. This deduction is required to be made at the time of credit of the amount of such sale or service or both to the account of an e-commerce participant or at the time of payment thereof to such e-COmmerce participant, whichever is earlier.

2. Finance Act, 2020 also inserted sub-section (11-1) in section 206C of the Act which mandates that with effect from I” day of October, 2020 a seller receiving an amount as consideration for sale of any goods of the value or aggregate of such value exceeding fifty lakh rupees in any previous year shall collect from the buyer, a sum equal to 0.1 per cent of the sale consideration exceeding fifty lakh rupees as income-tax. The collection is required to be made at the time of receipt of amount of sale consideration. Seller is defined as the person whose total sales or gross receipts or turnover from the business carried on by him exceed ten crore rupees during the financial year immediately preceding the financial year in which the sale of good is carried out. Central Government has been authorised to specify by notification in the Official Gazette, the person who would not be considered as seller for the purposes of this section, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions as specified therein.

3. Finance Act, 2021 inserted a new section 194Q to the Act which took effect from 1st day of July, 2021. It applies to any buyer who is responsible for paying any sum to any resident seller for purchase of any goods orthe value or aggregate of value exceeding fifty lakh rupees in any previous year. The buyer, at the time of credit of such sum to the account of the seller or at the time of payment, whichever is earlier, is required to deduct an amount equal to 0.1 % of such SUm exceeding fifty lakh rupees as income tax. Buyer is defined to be person whose total sales or gross receipts or turnover from the business carried on by him exceed ten crore rupees during the financial year immediately preceding the financial year in which the purchase of goods is carried out. Central Government has been authorised to specify by notification in the Official Gazette, person who would not be considered as buyer for the purposes of this section, subject to fulfillment of specified conditions.

4. Sub-section (4) of section 194-0, sub-section (3) of section 194Q and sub-section (H) of section 206C of the Act empowers the Board (with the approval of the Central Government) to issue guidelines for the purpose of removing difficulties.

4.1 In this regard, vide circular no. 17 of2020 dated 29.09.2020, guidelines were issued by the Board (with the approval of the Central Government) in relation to the provisions of section 194-0 and section 206C(1 H) of the Act in certain cases to remove difficulties and provide clarity for certain transactions.

4.2 Further, vide circular no. 13 of 2021 dated 30.06.2021, guidelines were issued by the Board in relation to the provisions of section 194Q of the Act through which the difficulties arising from the applicability of the provisions of section 194Q in certain cases were removed. Furthermore, guidelines with respect to the cross appl ication of the provisions of sections 194-0, 194Q and 206C (I H) of the Act were also issued through the said circular.

4.3 In continuation of the above, to further remove the difficulties, the Board, with the approval of the Central Government, hereby issues the following guidelines under sub-section (4) of section 194-0, subsection (3) of section 194Q and sub-section (I-I) of section 206C of the Act.

5. Guidelines

5.1 E-auction services carried out through electronic portal:

5.1.1 Representations have been received from various stakeholders involved in the business of carrying out e-auction services through electronic portal owned, operated or maintained by them (hereinafter referred as ‘e-auctioneer’). It has been stated that in an e-auction, the e-auctioneer involved in conducting the e-auction through its pOltal is responsible only for the price discovery for the sale/purchase of goods or services and the result of the auction report is submitted to the client. The client could be the buyer or the seller. Palticipants in the auctions are sellers (if client is buyer) or buyers (if client is seller). The transaction of sale/purchase is being carried out directly between the buyer and the seller which are not done through the electronic portal of the e-auctioneer. Further, the price so discovered can be further negotiated between the parties without the knowledge of the e-auctioneer. In such a scenario, it has been represented that provisions of section 194-0 of the Act does not apply as the transaction of sale/purchase itsel f is not taking place through the electronic portal.

5.1.2 From the representations made, the following facts have been noticed:

(a) The e-auctioneer conducts e-auction services for its clients in its electronic portal and is responsible for the price discovery only which is reported to the client.

(b) The price so discovered through e-auction process is not necessarily the price at which the transaction takes place and it is up to the discretion of the client to accept the price or to directly negotiate with the counter-party.

(c) The transaction of purchase/sale takes place directly between the buyer and the seller party outside the electronic portal maintained by the e-auctioneer and price discovery only acts as the starting point for negotiation and conclusion of purchase/sale.

(d) The e-auctioneer is not responsible for facilitating the purchase and sale of goods for which eauction was conducted on its electronic portal except to the extent of price discovery.

(e) Payments for the transactions are carried out directly between the buyer and the seller outside the electronic portal and the e-auctioneer does not have any information about the quantum and the schedule of payment which is decided mutually by the client and the counterparty.

(f) For payment made to e-auctioneer for providing e-auction services, the client deducts tax under the relevant provisions of the Act other than section 194-0 of the Act.

5.1.3 In order to remove difficulty, it is clarified that the provisions of section 194-0 of the Act shall not apply in relation to e-auction activities carried out bye-auctioneers ifall the facts listed at (a) to (f) of para 5.1.2 are satisfied. This clarification shall not apply if any of these facts are not satisfied. Further, it is clarified that the buyer and seller would still be liable to deduct/ collect tax as per the provisions of section 194Q and 206C (I H) of the Act, as the case may be.

5.2 Adjustment of various state levies and taxes other than GST

5.2.1 In Para 4.3.2 of circular no. 13 of 2021 dated 30.06.2021, it has been provided that in case the GST component has been indicated separately in the invoice and tax is deducted at the time of credit of the amount in the account of the seller, then the tax is to be deducted under section 194Q of the Act on the amount credited without including such GST. It has been further provided that in case the tax is deducted on payment basis ‘as the payment is earlier than the credit, the tax is to be deducted on the whole amount as it is not possible to identify that payment with GST component of the amount to be invoiced in future. Further, adjustment of tax deducted in case of purchase return has also been provided.

5.2.2 It has been represented that in case of goods which are not within the purview of GST, such as petroleum products, various levies like VAT, Excise duty, sales tax etc. are charged. While the treatment of GST component has been clarified in the circular no. 13 of 2021, the same is silent on other non-GST levies which have otherwise been subsumed and replaced by GST.

5.2.3 In this regard, it is hereby clarified that in case of purchase of goods which are not covered within the purview of GST, when tax is deducted at the time of credit of amount in the account of seller and in terms of the agreement or contract between the buyer and the seller, the component of VAT/Sales tax/Excise duty/CST, as the case may be, has been indicated separately in the invoice, then the tax is to be deducted under section 194Q of the Act on the amount credited without including such VAT/Excise duty/Sales tax/CST, as the case may be. However, if the tax is deducted on payment basis, if it is earlier than the credit, the tax is to be deducted on the whole amount as it will not be possible to identify the payment with VAT/Excise duty/Sales tax/CST component to be invoiced in the future. Furthermore, in case of purchase returns, the clarification as provided in Para 4.3.3 of circular no. 13 of 2021 shall also apply to purchase return relating to non GST products liable to VAT/excise duty/sales taxi CST etc.

5.3 Applicability of section 194Q of the Act in cases where exemption has been provided under section 206C (1 A) of the Act

5.3.1 Sub-section (I A) of scction 206C of the Act provides that notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (I) of the said section, no tax is to be collected in case ofa buyer, who is a resident in India, if such buyer furnishes to the person responsible for collecting tax, a declaration to the effect that the goods (as referred to in sub-section (I)) are to be utilized for the purposes of manufacturing, processing or producing articles or things or for the purposes of generation of power and not for trading purposes.

5.3.2 As per the provisions of sub-section (I H) of section 206C of the Act, tax is to be collected in respect of sale of goods other than the goods which have not been covered under sub-section (I) or subsection (I F) or sub-section (I G). It has been represented that in case of goods which are covered under the provisions of sub-section (I) of the said section but exempted under sub-section (IA), tax will not be collectible under either sub-section (I) or sub-section (I H) of section 206C as the provisions of subsection (I H) categorically exclude the goods which are covered under sub-section (I) of section 206C. It has been requested to clarify if the provisions of section 194Q of the Act will be applicable in such cases.

5.3.3 The issue has been examined. It is seen that the provisions of section 194Q of the Act does not apply in respect to those transactions where tax is collectible under section 206C [except sub-section (I H) thereof of the Act. Since by virtue of sub-section (IA) of section 206C of the Act, the tax is not required to be collected for goods covered under sub-section (I) of the said section, it is hereby clarified that in such cases, the provisions of section 194Q of the Act will apply and the buyer shall be liable to deduct tax under the said section if the conditions specified therein are fulfilled.

5.4 Applicability of the provisions of section 194Q in case of department of Government not being a public sector undertaking or corporation

5.4.1 There have been representations from department of the Government (both Central Government and State Government), to enquire if such department is required to deduct tax under the provisions of section 194Q of the Act.

5.4.2 As per the provisions of section 194Q, tax is to be deducted by a person, being a buyer, whose total sales, gross receipts or turnover from business carried on by that person exceed ten crore rupees during the financial year immediately preceding the financial year in which the goods are purchased by such person. Thus, for a person to be considered as a buyer for the purposes of section 194Q of the Act, following conditions are required to be fulfilled: (a) Such person shall be carrying out a business/ commercial activity; (b) The total sales, gross receipts or turnover from such business/ commercial activity shall be more than Rs. 10 crore during the financial year immediately preceding the financial year in which goods are being purchased by such person. In case of any Department of the Government which is not carrying out any business or commercial activity, the primary requirement for being considered as a ‘buyer’ will not be fulfilled. Accordingly, such an organization will not be considered as ‘buyer’ for the purposes of section 194Q of the Act and will not be liable to deduct tax on the goods so purchased by them. However, if the said department is carrying on a business/commercial activity, the provision of section 194Q of the Act shall apply subject to the fulfillment of other conditions.

5.4.3 Issue has been raised in case where any department of the Government will be considered as a ‘seller’ for the purposes of deduction of tax under section 194Q of the Act. In this regard, it is hereby clarified that for the purposes of section 194Q, Central Government or State Government shall not be considered as ‘seller’ and no tax is to be deducted by the buyer, in cases where any Department of Central or State Government are seller of goods.

5.4.4 In connection with above, it is further clarified that any other person, such as a Public sector Undertaking or corporation established under Central or Stale Act or any other such body, authority or entity, shall be required to comply with the provisions of section 194Q and tax shall be deducted accordingly.

Search operations on Indian companies and their associate concerns, controlled by a neighbouring country (Press release 25 Nov 2021)

The Income Tax Department has carried out search and seizure operations on certain Indian companies and their associate concerns, controlled by a neighboring country on 16.11.2021. These companies are engaged in the business of chemicals, ball bearings, machinery parts, and Injection moulding machinery.    The search action covered around 20 premises spread over Mumbai, Ahmedabad and Gandhidham in Gujarat and also in Delhi.  

 A large number of incriminating evidence in the form of digital data showing earning of huge unaccounted income by these companies has been found and seized. It has been found that these companies are indulging in tax evasion through manipulation of books of accounts.  The analysis of evidence has revealed that these companies have indulged in transferring funds by using a network of shell companies to a neighbouring country. An estimated amount of Rs 20 crore was transferred in the last 2 years through the above modus operandi.

Investigations have revealed that a Mumbai-based professional firm not only assisted in formation of these shell companies but also provided dummy directors to these shell companies. The investigations have also shown that these dummy directors were either the employees/drivers of the professional firm or they were persons of no means. On questioning, they admitted that they were not aware of the activities of these companies and that they had been signing on documents as per the instructions of the key functionaries.  The professional firm is also instrumental in assisting the foreign nationals by providing its addresses for banking and other regulatory requirements.

One of such companies trading in chemicals was found to be routing the claim of purchases through Marshall Island, a low tax jurisdiction. The company actually purchased items worth Rs. 56 crore from a neighbouring companybut the same has been billed from Marshall Island. However, payment for such purchases has been made into thebank account of the Marshall Island-based company which is held in the neighbouring country.  It was further unearthed during the search proceedings that this Indian company was also involved in taking non-genuine purchase bills to reduce its tax liability and also paid unaccounted cash for purchase of land in India.

The search action has already resulted in the seizure of unaccounted cash of about Rs. 66 lakh. Bank accounts of some of the companies, with aggregate bank balances of about Rs. 28 crore, have been put under restraint. 

  Further investigations are under progress.

Judiciary updates (Income tax & GST)- 25th Nov 2021

INCOME TAX

HC directs AO to pay ₹25000 to PM CARES for not following section 144B

Parag Kishorchandra Shah Vs The National Faceless Assessment Center & Ors. (Bombay High Court) dated 27/10/2021

Transfer Pricing Officer: Quasi-capital are treated differently than normal loan transactions

Bilakhia Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Surat) dated 11/10/2021

GST

No withholding of GST refund on account of need for verification of suppliers to supplier of ultimate exporter

Bhagyanagar Copper Private Limited Vs Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs (Telangana High Court) dated 28/09/2021

GST Registration cancellation on Hyper-Technical grounds causes Revenue Loss: HC

CIGFIL Retail Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) dated 10/11/2021

Vires of Section 16(2) of CGST Act, 2017 challenged before HC

Unifab Engineering Project Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs Deputy Commissioner CGST And CEX (Bombay High Court) dated 16/11/2021

Provisional attachment after expiry of one year breaches Section 83 provisions of CGST Act

Formative Tex Fab Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) dated 21/10/2021

Services by ‘Airbus Group India’ are ‘Intermediary service’ & liable to GST

 In re Airbus Group India Pvt. Ltd.  (GST AAAR Karnataka dated 09/11/2021

Bombay HC issues notice in challenge to Constitutional validity of 16(4) of CGST Act

Meta Tiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) dated 29/10/2021

Regards

Bipul Kumar

आयकर विभाग ने गुजरात में एक प्रमुख गुटखा वितरक की तलाशी लीPress Release- Nov 23, 2021

आयकर विभाग ने 16 नवंबर, 2021 को गुजरात के एक प्रमुख गुटखा वितरक के ठिकानों पर तलाशी और जब्ती अभियान चलाया। अहमदाबाद में विभिन्न जगहों पर स्थित 15 से अधिक परिसरों पर तलाशी अभियान चलाया गया।

तलाशी कार्रवाई के दौरान, विभिन्न आपत्तिजनक दस्तावेज और डिजिटल साक्ष्य पाए गए और उन्हें जब्त कर लिया गया है। इन साक्ष्यों का प्रारंभिक विश्लेषण स्पष्ट रूप से कर योग्य आय की चोरी को इंगित करता है और इसके लिए कई तरह के गलत कार्य किये गए, जैसे बिना हिसाब के सामग्री की खरीद करना, बिक्री को कम करके दिखाना और बिना हिसाब के नकद में व्यय करना। जब्त सामग्री के आगे के विश्लेषण से पता चलता है कि इन नकद बिक्री का एक हिस्सा हिसाब-किताब में दर्ज ही नहीं किया गया है। तलाशी लेने गयी टीम को अचल संपत्तियों में अघोषित निवेश के सबूत भी मिले हैं।

तलाशी अभियान में बिना हिसाब वाली करीब 7.50 करोड़ रुपये की नकदी और बिना हिसाब-किताब वाले लगभग 4 करोड़ रुपये के आभूषण बरामद हुए है। बैंक लॉकरों पर भी निषेधाज्ञा लगा दी गई है।

अब तक की गई तलाशी कार्रवाई में 100 करोड़ रुपये से अधिक की बेहिसाब आय का पता चला है। इसमें से, समूह ने 30 करोड़ रुपये से अधिक की अघोषित आय को स्वीकार किया है।

आगे की जांच जारी है।