Bhagavad Gita : Reside happily in the city of nine gates [ the material body] (Karma-yoga-Action in Krsna (divine) Consciousness (Text 13, Ch 5)

Sarva-karmani manasa 
sannyasyaste sukham vasi
nava-dvare pure dehi
naiva kurvan na karayan

(Text 13, Ch 5)

Meaning: When the embodied living being controls his nature and mentally renounces all actions, he resides happily in the city of nine gates [the material body], neither working nor causing work to be done.

*** The Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is living within the body of a living entity, is the controller of all living entities all over the universe. The body consists of nine gates [ two eyes, two nostrils, two ears, one mouth, the anus and the genitals]. The living entity in his conditioned stage identifies himself with the body, but when he identifies himself with the Lord within himself, he becomes just as free as the Lord, even while in the body.

Bhagavad Gita : The steadily devoted soul attains unadulterated peace (Karma-yoga-Action in Krsna (divine) Consciousness (Text 12, Ch 5)

Yuktah karma-phalam tyaktva
santim apnoti naisthikim
ayuktah kama-karena
phale sakto nibadhyate

(Text 12, Ch 5)

Meaning: The steadily devoted soul attains unadulterated peace because he offers the result of all activities to Me; whereas a person who is not in union with the Divine, who is greedy for the fruits of his labor, becomes entangled.


*** The person who is attached to Krsna(Divine) and works for him only is certainly a liberated person, and he has no anxiety over the results of his work.

CBEC explains provisions on refund of IGST paid on exports and unutilised ITC

CBEC explains provisions on refund of IGST paid on exports and unutilised ITC

The GST law provides for multiple options to the zero rated suppliers to claim refund of taxes paid on the input side. The persons making zero rated supplies will be entitled to provisional refund of 90% of the claim. Further, the time lines have been set for processing of refund claims and claims not settled within 60 days will be paid with interest @ 6%.

Refund of Integrated Tax paid on account of zero rated supplies

Export of Goods

The normal refund application in GST RFD-01 is not applicable in this case. There is no need for filing a separate refund claim as the shipping bill filed by the exporter is itself treated as a refund claim. As per rule 96 of the CGST Rules, 2017, the shipping bill filed by an exporter shall be deemed to be an application for refund of integrated tax paid on the goods exported out of India and such application shall be deemed to have been filed only when:- (a) the person in charge of the conveyance carrying the export goods duly files an export manifest or an export report covering the number and the date of shipping bills or bills of export; and (b) the applicant has furnished a valid return in FORM GSTR-3 or FORM GSTR3B, as the case may be.


Thus, once the shipping bill and export general manifest (EGM) is filed and a valid return is filed, the application for refund shall be considered to have been filed and refund shall be processed by the department.


Service Exporters and Persons making supplies to SEZ

Under this category also, the supplier may choose to first pay IGST and then claim refund of the IGST
so paid. In these cases, the suppliers will have to file refund claim in FORM GST RFD – 01 on the
common portal, as per Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017. Service Exporters need to file a statement
containing the number and date of invoices and the relevant Bank Realisation Certificates or
Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates, as the case may be, along with the refund claim.



In so far as refund is on account of supplies made to SEZ, the DTA supplier will have to file the refund
claim in such cases. The second proviso to Rule 89 stipulates that in respect of supplies to a Special
Economic Zone unit or a Special Economic Zone developer, the application for refund shall be filed
by the –

(a) Supplier of goods after such goods have been admitted in full in the Special Economic Zone for authorised operations, as endorsed by the specified officer of the Zone;

(b) Supplier of services along with such evidence regarding receipt of services for authorised
operations as endorsed by the specified officer of the Zone.

Thus, proof of receipt of goods or services as evidenced by the specified officer of the zone is a
pre-requisite for filing of refund claim by the DTA supplier.

The claim for refund when made for supplies made to SEZ unit/Developer has to be filed along with
the following documents:

1. A statement containing the number and date of invoices as provided in rule 46 along with the evidence regarding the endorsement specified in the second proviso to sub-rule (1) in the case of the supply of goods made to a Special Economic Zone unit or a Special Economic Zone developer;

2. A statement containing the number and date of invoices, the evidence regarding the endorsement specified in the second proviso to sub-rule (1) and the details of payment, along with the proof thereof, made by the recipient to the supplier for authorised operations as defined under the Special Economic Zone Act, 2005, in a case where the refund is on account of supply of services made to a Special Economic Zone unit or a Special Economic Zone developer;

3. A declaration to the effect that the Special Economic Zone unit or the Special Economic
Zone developer has not availed the input tax credit of the tax paid by the supplier of goods
or services or both, in a case where the refund is on account of supply of goods or services
made to a Special Economic Zone unit or a Special Economic Zone developer.

Grant of Provisional Refund

The above category of persons making zero rated supplies will be entitled to provisional refund of
90% of the claim in terms of Section 54(6) of CGST Act, 2017.

Rule 91 of CGST Rules, 2017 provide that the provisional refund is to be granted within 7 days from the date of acknowledgement of the refund claim. An order for provisional refund is to be issued in Form GST RFD 04 along with payment advice in the name of the claimant in Form GST RFD 05. The amount will be electronically credited to the claimant’s bank account. Rule 91 also prescribe that the provisional refund will not be granted if the person claiming refund has, during any period of five years immediately preceding the tax period to which the claim for refund relates, been prosecuted for any offence under the Act or under an earlier law where the amount of tax evaded exceeds two hundred and fifty lakh rupees.


Refund of unutilised Input Tax Credit (ITC)



Accumulation of Input Tax Credit happens when the tax paid on inputs is more than the output tax liability.
Such accumulation will have to be carried over to the next financial year till such time as it can be utilised
by the registered person for payment of output tax liability. However, the GST Law permits refund of
unutilised ITC in two scenarios, namely if such credit accumulation is on account of zero rated supplies
or on account of inverted duty structure, subject to certain exceptions.

As per Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, a registered person may claim refund of unutilised input tax credit at the end of any tax period. A tax period is the period for which return is required to be furnished.

Thus, a taxpayer can claim refund of unutilised ITC on monthly basis.

Refund of unutilised input tax credit is allowed only in following two cases


a) Zero rated supplies made without payment of tax: As per Section 16(3) of the IGST Act, 2017,
a registered person making zero rated supply is eligible to claim refund under either of the following options, namely: –

• Supply of goods or services or both under bond or Letter of Undertaking, subject to such conditions,
safeguards and procedure as may be prescribed, without payment of integrated tax and claim refund of unutilised input tax credit; or


• Supply of goods or services or both, subject to such conditions, safeguards and procedure as may
be prescribed, on payment of integrated tax and claim refund of such tax paid on goods or services

or both supplied.

The first category pertains to refund of unutilised ITC for which the registered person has to supply
under Bond/LUT (as prescribed in Rule 96A of CGST Rules)and in the second category supply has been
made after payment of Tax (IGST). In both the cases, refund can be applied under Section 54 of
the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 89 or Rule 96 , as the case may be, of the CGST Rules, 2017.

b) Inverted duty structure: Where the credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies (other than nil rated or fully exempt supplies), except supplies of goods or services or both as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council.

In such cases also, refund can be applied under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017.

It should be noted that no refund of unutilised input tax credit is allowed in cases where the goods exported out of India are subjected to export duty. Further, no refund of input tax credit is allowed, if the supplier of goods or services or both avails of drawback in respect of central tax or claims refund of the integrated tax paid on such supplies.

Refund of ITC on account of zero-rated supplies

The application filed for refund of unutilized ITC on account of zero-rated supplies (with payment of tax
or without payment of tax under Bond/LUT) has to be accompanied by documentary evidence as may
be prescribed to establish that a refunds due to the applicant; and such documentary or other evidence
(including the documents referred to in section 33 of the CGST Act, 2017) as the applicant may furnish to
establish that the amount of tax and interest, if any, paid on such tax or any other amount paid in relation
to which such refund is claimed was collected from, or paid by, him and the incidence of such tax and interest had not been passed on to any other person.

Rule 89(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, specifies documents to be attached with the refund application in case of different types of Refund applicants.

However, it has been provided under section 54(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, that where the amount claimed as refund is less than two lakh rupees, it shall not be necessary for the applicant to furnish any documentary and other evidences but he may file a declaration, based on the documentary or other evidences available with him, certifying that the incidence of such tax and interest had not been passed on to any other person.

It has also been provided under section 54(6) of the CGST Act, 2017, that in cases where the claim for refund on account of zero-rated supply of goods or services or both made by registered persons, other than such category of registered persons as maybe notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council, refund on a provisional basis, ninety per cent. of the total amount so claimed, excluding the amount of input tax credit provisionally accepted; and the final order shall be issued within sixty days from the date of receipt of application complete in all respects (section 54(7) of the CGST Act, 2017 refers).

Rule 91 of CGST Rules, 2017 provide that the provisional refund is to be granted within 7 days from the date of acknowledgement of the refund claim. An order for provisional refund is to be issued in Form GST RFD 04 along with payment advice in the name of the claimant in Form GST RFD 05. The amount will be electronically credited to the claimant’s bank account. The rules also prescribe the provisional refund will not be granted to if the person claiming refund has, during any period of five years immediately preceding the tax period to which the claim for refund relates, been prosecuted for any offence under the Act or under an earlier law where the amount of tax evaded exceeds two hundred and fifty lakh rupees;


It may also be noted that by default, the refund is to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund, except in the cases below:-

(a) Refund of tax paid on zero-rated supplies of goods or services or both or on inputs or input services
used in making such zero-rated supplies;

(b) Refund of unutilised input tax credit under section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017;

(c) Refund of tax paid on a supply which is not provided, either wholly or partially, and for which invoice has not been issued, or where a refund voucher has been issued;


(d) Refund of tax in pursuance of section 77;

(e) The tax and interest, if any, or any other amount paid by the applicant, if he had not passed on the
incidence of such tax and interest to any other person; or

(f) The tax or interest borne by such other class of applicants as the Government may, on the
recommendations of the Council, by notification, specify.


Formula for grant of refund in cases where the refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit is on account of zero rated supply is based on the following:

Refund Amount = (turnover of zero rated supply of goods + turnover of zero rated supply of services) x Net ITC /Adjusted total turnover


Where: –

(A) “Refund amount” means the maximum refund that is admissible;

(B) “Net ITC” means input tax credit availed on inputs and input services during the relevant period;

(C) “Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods” means the value of zero-rated supply of goods made
during the relevant period without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking;


(D) “Turnover of zero-rated supply of services” means the value of zero-rated supply of services
made without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking, calculated in the following
manner, namely: –

Zero-rated supply of services is the aggregate of the payments received during the relevant period for zero-rated supply of services and zerorated supply of services where supply has been completed for which payment had been received in advance in any period prior to the relevant period reduced by advances received for zerorated supply of services for which the supply of services has not been completed during the relevant period;


(E) “Adjusted Total turnover” means the turnover in a State or a Union territory, as defined under subsection(112) of section 2, excluding the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies,
during the relevant period;


(F) “Relevant period” means the period for which the claim has been filed.


Refund of ITC on account of inverted duty structure.

As per Section 54(3), refund of accumulated ITC will be granted where the credit accumulation has taken
place on account of inverted duty structure. However, the Government also has the power to notify supplies where refund of ITC will not be admissible even if such credit accumulation is on account of an inverted duty structure. In exercise of the powers conferred by this section, the government has issued Notification no.15/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 wherein it has been notified that no refund of unutilised input tax credit shall be allowed under sub-section (3) of section 54 of the said Central Goods and Services Tax Act, in case of supply of services specified in sub-item (b) of item 5 of Schedule II of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The supplies specified under item 5(b) of Schedule II are construction services. In respect of goods, the central government has issued
Notification no.5/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017. The government has notified the  goods in respect of which unutilized ITC will not be admissible as refund (Refer Notification no.15/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017).

Further, Rule 89(2)(h) of CGST Rules, 2017 stipulate that refund claim on account of accumulated ITC
(where such accumulation is on account of inverted duty structure) has to be accompanied by a statement containing the number and date of invoices received and issued during a tax period. Rule 89(3) of CGST Rules, 2017 also provide that where the application relates to refund of input tax credit, the electronic credit ledger shall be debited by the applicant in an amount equal to the refund so claimed.

Provisions similar for refund of accumulated ITC for both types of Refund Applicants (suppliers making zero-rated / inverted duty supplies)

Where the application relates to refund of input tax credit, the electronic credit ledger shall be debited
by the applicant by an amount equal to the refund so claimed as per Rule 89(3) of CGST Rules, 2017.
Also, interest will be paid for any delay in sanctioning of Refund beyond the mandated period of 60 days (as per Rule 94 of CGST Rules, 2017).

The refund and/or interest sanctioned, if any, will be directly credited to the bank account of the applicant.

Conclusion

The GST Law provides for multiple options to the zero rated suppliers to claim refund of taxes paid on
the input side. One of the options is export under bond or LUT and claim refund of unutilised ITC. The
law also provides for refund of unutilised ITC where credit accumulation is on account of inverted duty
structure, subject to certain riders. Time lines have been set for processing of refund claims and claims
not settled within 60 days will be paid with interest @6%. Moreover, 90% of the claim would be paid
within 7 days of acknowledgement of claim on provisional basis. Claims are to be filed with minimum
documentation and the refund amount will be credited directly to the claimant’s bank account. The
process is online and hassle free and with minimum interface with tax authorities.




Threshold limit for Composition scheme increased from Rs. 75 lakhs to Rs. 1 crore (N/No. 46/2017- Central Tax New Delhi, the 13th October, 2017)

Threshold limit for Composition scheme has been increased from Rs. 75 lakhs to Rs. 1 crore


The threshold limit for Composition scheme has been increased from Rs. 75 lakhs to Rs. 1 crore and the turnover limit for special category States, except Jammu & Kashmir and Uttarakhand States has been increased from Rs.50 lakhs to Rs. 75 lakhs.

Refer Notification No. 46/2017- Central Tax New Delhi, the 13th October, 2017

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)] GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) 
Notification No. 46/2017- Central Tax New Delhi, the13th October, 2017


G.S.R. (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.8/2017- Central Tax, dated the 27th June, 2017, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 647 (E), dated the 27th June, 2017, namely:-


In the said notification,- 

  (i) for the words “seventy-five lakh rupees”, the words, “one crore rupees” shall be substituted; 

(ii) for the words “fifty lakh rupees”, the words, “seventy-five lakh rupees” shall be substituted;



[F. No. 354/117/2017- TRU (Pt. III)]
(Ruchi Bisht)
Under Secretary to Government of India

No denial of Sec. 54B relief merely because new property was purchased without registered sales deed

No denial of Sec. 54B relief merely because new property was purchased without registered sales deed.



Where assessee sold land and claimed deduction under section 54B on purchase of agricultural lands one through registered sale deed and another through an agreement to sell, assessee could not be denied benefit of deduction u/s 54B in respect of purchase of property through agreement to sell.

‘Purchase’ cannot be interpreted and detached from definition of word ‘transfer’ as given u/s 2(47). When transfer takes effect as per provisions of section 2(47), if a liability to pay tax arise in case of seller, consequent right to get deduction on purchase of property accrues in favour of purchaser, if he otherwise is so eligible to claim it as per relevant provisions of Act.

Refer extract of Judgement:

■■■
[2017] 86 taxmann.com 217 (Chandigarh – Trib.)
IN THE ITAT CHANDIGARH BENCH
Anil Bishnoi
v.
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Chandigarh
SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND MS. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IT APPEAL NO. 1459 (CHD.) OF 2016
[ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15]
SEPTEMBER  27, 2017 
T.N. Singla for the Appellant. Smt. Chanderkanta for the Respondent.
ORDER
Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member – The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-3 [hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)], Gurgaon dated 31.10.2016.
2. The sole issue raised by the assessee in this appeal is against the action of the lower authorities of denial of deduction u/s 54B of the Act in relation to the Investment in agricultural land. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee during the year under consideration sold land for a consideration of Rs. 1,29,00,000/- and claimed deduction u/s 54B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) claiming purchase of following agricultural lands:-
(i)   Agricultural land at Kiratpur Rotwara, Tehsil Phagi Jaipur of Rs. 28,84,500/- though a registered sale deed dated 6.5.2013.
(ii)   Agricultural land at Village Dudu, Tehsil Mojmabad, Jaipur for Rs. 1,00,00,000/- through an agreement to sell dated 16.4.2014.
The Assessing officer though allowed the deduction in respect of purchase of land at S.No. (i) above, however, he show caused the assessee in respect of deduction claimed in respect of land as mentioned at S.No. (ii) above, observing that for getting the claim of deduction it is necessary that the sale deed should be registered, whereas, in the case of purchase of land at Village Dudu allegedly for a sum of Rs. 1,00,00,000/-, it was by way of an agreement to sell and not through registered Deed. The assessee explained that the entire payment for purchase of the land was made through cheques and the possession was handed over to the assessee by the seller with all the rights to use the said land or to sell it further. The name of the assessee had also been entered in Kashra Girdawari a document showing the possession and cultivation of the land. It was also explained that at the time of the execution of the agreement to sell, the assessee was not aware of the Stay Order to the sale of land issued by the ADM and hence due to the above legal obstruction, the sale deed could not be registered.
3. The Ld. Assessing officer, however, rejected the above contention of the assessee and observed that the word used in section 54B of the Act is ‘purchase’ and not the word ‘transfer’ as defined u/s 2(47) of the Act. He observed that though as per the definition of word ‘transfer’ it is not necessary to get deed registered, however, in the case of purchase of immovable property, the same can be done through registered sale deed only.
4. The assessee unsuccessfully contested the appeal before Ld. CIT(A).
5. Before us, Ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee has reiterated his submissions as were made before the lower authorities. He has further submitted that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause for not registering the deed of the purchase of property as the alienation of the same was stayed by the ADM and that the assessee was not aware of the said Stay Order at the time of entering into the transactions. He has further relied upon the following decisions and submitted that for the claim of deduction u/s 54 of the Act, the registration of sale deed is not necessary. It is enough if the assessee has paid the consideration, acquired the possession with full rights and has fulfilled other requirements of the provisions of the Act:-
1.   Sh. Sanjeev Lal etc. v. CIT 269 CTR 001(SC) 2014
2.   CIT v. T.N. Aravinda Reddy [1979] 12 CTR 0423 (SC)
3.   CIT v. K. Jelani Basha [2002] 256 ITR 0282 (Madras)
4.   CIT v. Ram Gopal [2015] 372 ITR 498 (Delhi)
5.   Balraj v. CIT [2002] 254 ITR 22 (Delhi)
6.   CIT v. R.L. Sood [2000] 245 ITR 727 (Delhi)
7.   CIT v. Dr Laxmichand Narpal Nagda, [1995] 211 ITR 804 (Bom.)
8.   CIT v Mrs. Shahzada Begum, [1988]73 CTR 0229 (A.P.)
9.   S. Dabir Singh, Jalandhar v. Department of Income TaxITA No. 27 (Asr.)/2015
6. On the other hand, Ld. DR had relied upon the findings of the lower authorities.
7. We have heard the rival contentions and have also gone through the record. Admittedly, the assessee paid the consideration through cheques and also obtained the possession of the property in question. The claim of deduction u/s 54B of the Act has been denied to the assessee on the ground that the said deed of purchase/ sale had not been registered with the competent authority. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘Sanjeev Lal v. CIT’ (supra) has discussed as to whether the agreement to sell can be considered to be an instrument of transfer of property. The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that though in normal circumstances by executing an agreement to sell in respect of immovable property, a right in personam is created in favour of the transferee/ vendee and when such a right is created, the vendor is restrained to sell the said property to someone else because the transferee has got a legitimate right to enforce specific performance of said agreement to sell. In normal circumstances, it cannot be said that entire property have been sold at the time when agreement to sell is entered into. However, looking at the provisions of section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, ‘transfer’ in relation to the capital asset is complete if a right in a property is extinguished by executing an agreement to sell, the capital asset can be deemed to have been transferred. The Hon’ble Supreme Court thus held that the transfer was compete on the execution of agreement to sell and that the assessee was entitled to claim of deduction u/s 54 in respect of purchase of new residential house subsequent to such transfer through agreement to sell. In the case of ‘T.R. Arvinda Reddy’ (supra), the Hon’ble Supreme Court while interpreting the word ‘purchase’ referred to in section 54(1) of the Act held that the ordinary meaning of the word ‘Purchase’ as buying for price or equivalent of price by payment in kind or adjustment towards an old debt or other monetary consideration and that there was no reason to divorce this ordinary meaning from the legal meaning of the word in section 54(1) of the Income Tax Act. The decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court has been further followed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of ‘CIT v. Dr. Laxmichand Narpal Nagda’, (supra), wherein the Hon’ble Bombay High Court has observed as under:-
“6. Taking into consideration the letter as well as the spirit of section 54 and the “towards” used before the word “Purchase” in sub-section (2) of section 54, it seems to us that this said word is not used in the sense of legal transfer and, therefore, the holding of a legal title within a period of one year is not a condition precedent for attracting section 54. In the instant case, the whole consideration was paid, possession of the flat was obtained and it was actually put to use for dwelling within four months, as a result exemption contemplated u/s 54 was clearly attracted.”
8. We may further like to add here that if capital gains are deemed to have been earned by the assessee on transfer of land as per the provisions of Section 2(47) of the Act, as per which the registration of the sale deed is not necessary, the consequences are that the seller or the assessee is said to have transferred his right in property and consequently those rights are acquired by the transferee; if in the case of transferor the same is to be treated as sale, then, we do not find any reason to give a different meaning to the word ‘Purchase’. If someone has sold a property, consequently the other person has purchased the said property. If the transfer of property is complete as per the definition of transfer u/s 2(47) of the Act, the assessee is made labile to pay tax on the capital gains earned by him, on the same analogy, the transfer is also complete in favour of the purchaser also. The provisions cannot be interpreted in a manner to say that transfer vis-a-vis selling is complete but vis-a-vis purchase is not complete in respect of same transaction. In view of this, the word ‘Purchase’ cannot be interpreted and detached from the definition of word ‘transfer’ as given u/s 2(47) of the Act. When the transfer takes effect as per the provisions of section 2(47) of the Act, if a liability to pay tax arise in the case of the seller, the consequent right to get deduction on the purchase of property accrues in favour of the purchaser, if he otherwise is so eligible to claim it as per the relevant provisions of the Act.
9. In view of our above observations, the Assessing officer is directed to give the benefit of deduction u/s 54B of the Act in respect of the purchase of the property at Village Dadu to the assessee.
10. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Bhagavad Gita : A person in divine consciousness (Karma-yoga-Action in Krsna (divine) Consciousness (Text 8,9, Ch 5)

Naiva kincit karomiti
Yukto manyeta tattva-vit
Pasyan srnvan sprsan jighrann
Asnan gacchan svapan svasan

Pralapan visrjan grhnann
Unmisan nimisann api
Indriyanindriyarthesu
Vartanta iti dharayan

(Text 8, 9, Ch 5)

Meaning: A person  in the divine consciousness, although  engaged in seeing, hearing, touching, smelling, eating, moving about, sleeping and breathing, always knows within himself  that he actually  does nothing at all. Because while speaking, evacuating, receiving or opening  or closing his eyes, he always knows that only the material senses are engaged with their objects and that he is aloof from them.

Bhagavad Gita : Engaged in devotional service (Karma-yoga-Action in Krsna (divine) Consciousness (Text 6, Ch 5)

Sannyasas tu maha-baho
Duhkham aptum ayogatah
Yoga-yukto munir brahma
na cirenadhigacchati
(Text 6, Ch 5)

Meaning : Merely renouncing all activities  yet not engaging  in the devotional  service of the Lord cannot make one happy. But a thoughtful person engaged in devotional service can achieve the supreme without delay.