CGST Bhiwandi Commissionerate arrests businessman for running fake ITC network (bogus billing of more than 63 Crores) Press Release Dated 22th Jan 2022

  The officers of Bhiwandi Commissionerate of CGST Mumbai Zone have arrested a businessman was running a Fake GST Input Tax Credit racket. Acting on an intelligence from Central Intelligence Unit of Mumbai CGST Zone, the officers initiated coordinated action at different locations in Thane, Bhiwandi, Raigad and Mumbai and detected GST evasion of Rs 11.4 crores through generation and passing of fake ITC through intricate web of bogus billing of more than 63 Crores.

          The search was conducted at Bhiwandi based business premises of M/s. Adarsh Scrap Traders which was indulging in bogus billing and availment and passing on of fake ITC and thus defrauding the Government exchequer of its rightful GST revenue. The initial investigation revealed that firm had fraudulently claimed and passed on Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs.11.4 Crores without actual supply or receipt of goods. The proprietor of the firm, confessed to the bogus billing and running of fake ITC racket. He was arrested on 21.01.2022 under Section 69 of CGST Act, 2017 and was produced before the Hon’ble Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Fort, Mumbai, today on 22.1.2022. The Hon’ble CMM has remanded the accused to 14 days judicial custody, till 04.02.2022.

          The amount of fake ITC involved is likely to go up during the ongoing investigation once the entire network is investigated. The roots of this network are spread across the cities of Nagpur, Pune, Delhi and Nasik apart from Mumbai and Thane. At this stage, it seems that around 25 entities are part of this network. Jurisdictional Commissionerates are being informed to initiate legal action against the firms falling in their jurisdiction.

          This operation is a part of efforts by CGST Mumbai Zone to eradicate fake ITC networks, which have been vitiating the healthy economic ecosystem of the country and defrauding the Government Exchequer. This the Sixth arrest by Bhiwandi Commissionerate in last 6 months. The department will intensify the drive against fake ITC networks and other GST evaders in the coming months.

***

CGST Bhiwandi Commissionerate/CP/PK

सीजीएसटी भिवंडी कमिश्नरी ने एक व्यवसायी को गिरफ्तार किया


नकली आईटीसी नेटवर्क, 63 करोड़ रुपये की फर्जी बिलिंग का मामला
Posted Date:- Jan 22, 2022

सीजीएसटी भिवंडी कमिश्नरी ने एक व्यवसायी को गिरफ्तार किया और एक नकली आईटीसी नेटवर्क को तोड़ दिया जिसने 63 करोड़ रुपये की फर्जी बिलिंग की।

सीजीएसटी मुंबई जोन के भिवंडी कमिश्नरी के अधिकारियों ने 25 से अधिक फर्जी संस्थाओं के एक नकली इनपुट टैक्स क्रेडिट रैकेट का भंडाफोड़ किया है, जिसने 63 करोड़ रुपये से अधिक की फर्जी बिलिंग की और नकली आईटीसी के माध्यम से सरकार को 11.4 करोड़ रुपये का चूना लगाया। एक फर्जी इकाई के मालिक को गिरफ्तार किया गया है।

मुंबई सीजीएसटी जोन की सेंट्रल इंटेलिजेंस यूनिट से एक खुफिया जानकारी पर कार्रवाई करते हुए, अधिकारियों ने ठाणे, भिवंडी, रायगढ़ और मुंबई में विभिन्न स्थानों पर समन्वित कार्रवाई शुरू की और फर्जी बिलिंग के जटिल वेब के माध्यम से नकली आईटीसी के उत्पादन और पासिंग के माध्यम से 11.4 करोड़ रुपये की जीएसटी चोरी का पता लगाया ।

तलाशी, मैसर्स के भिवंडी स्थित व्यावसायिक परिसर में की गई। प्रारंभिक जांच से पता चला है कि फर्म ने धोखे से दावा किया था और माल की वास्तविक आपूर्ति या प्राप्ति के बिना 11.4 करोड़ रुपये के इनपुट टैक्स क्रेडिट (आईटीसी) को पारित कर दिया था। फर्म के मालिक ने फर्जी बिलिंग और फर्जी आईटीसी रैकेट चलाने की बात कबूल की। उन्हें सीजीएसटी अधिनियम, 2017 की धारा 69 के तहत 21.01.2022 को गिरफ्तार किया गया था और आज 22.1.2022 को माननीय अतिरिक्त मुख्य मेट्रोपॉलिटन मजिस्ट्रेट, फोर्ट, मुंबई के समक्ष पेश किया गया। माननीय सीएमएम ने आरोपी को 04.02.2022 तक 14 दिनों की न्यायिक हिरासत में भेज दिया है।

पूरे नेटवर्क की जांच के बाद चल रही जांच के दौरान इसमें शामिल नकली आईटीसी की मात्रा बढ़ने की संभावना है। इस नेटवर्क की जड़ें मुंबई और ठाणे के अलावा नागपुर, पुणे, दिल्ली और नासिक शहरों में फैली हुई हैं। इस स्तर पर, ऐसा लगता है कि लगभग 25 संस्थाएं इस नेटवर्क का हिस्सा हैं। क्षेत्राधिकार आयुक्तालयों को उनके अधिकार क्षेत्र में आने वाली फर्मों के खिलाफ कानूनी कार्रवाई शुरू करने के लिए सूचित किया जा रहा है।

यह ऑपरेशन सीजीएसटी मुंबई ज़ोन द्वारा नकली आईटीसी नेटवर्क को मिटाने के प्रयासों का एक हिस्सा है, जो देश के स्वस्थ आर्थिक पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र को खराब कर रहा है और सरकारी खजाने को धोखा दे रहा है। पिछले 6 महीनों में भिवंडी कमिश्नरी द्वारा यह छठी गिरफ्तारी है। विभाग आने वाले महीनों में नकली आईटीसी नेटवर्क और अन्य जीएसटी चोरों के खिलाफ अभियान तेज करेगा।

CBDT notifies E-advance rulings Scheme, 2022 vide Notification No. 07/2022 dated 18th January, 2022.

Advance Ruling means written opinion or authoritative decision by an Authority empowered to render it with regard to the tax consequences of a transaction or proposed transaction or an assessment in regard thereto. It has been defined in section 245N(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as amended from time-to-time.

 “advance ruling” means—

   (i) a determination by the Authority in relation to a transaction which has been undertaken or is proposed to be undertaken by a non-resident applicant; or

  (ii) a determination by the Authority in relation to the tax liability of a non-resident arising out of a transaction which has been undertaken or is proposed to be undertaken by a resident applicant with such non-resident; or*

(iia) a determination by the Authority in relation to the tax liability of a resident applicant, arising out of a transaction which has been undertaken or is proposed to be undertaken by such applicant;

and such determination shall include the determination of any question of law or of fact specified in the application;

 (iii) a determination or decision by the Authority in respect of an issue relating to computation of total income which is pending before any income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal and such determination or decision shall include the determination or decision of any question of law or of fact relating to such computation of total income specified in the application;

 (iv) a determination or decision by the Authority whether an arrangement, which is proposed to be undertaken by any person being a resident or a non-resident, is an impermissible avoidance arrangement as referred to in Chapter X-A or not:

CBDT notifies E-advance rulings Scheme, 2022 vide Notification No. 07/2022 dated 18th January, 2022. 

E-advance rulings Scheme, 2022 shall be applicable to applications of advance rulings,– 

(a) made to the Board for Advance Rulings under sub-section (1) of section 245Q of the Act; or 

(b) transferred to Board for Advance Rulings under sub-section (4) of section 245Q of the Act.

Download Notification

Notification No. 7/2022 [F.No.370142/62/2021-TPL(Part-I)] / SO 248(E) : e-advance Rulings Scheme, 2022 !New 18 January 2022

https://incometaxindia.gov.in/communications/notification/notification-7-2022.pdf

MSME units are together capable of constituting a complete supply chain

There is tremendous potential for Indian engineering MSMEs to be integrated into the Global Value Chain due to their manufacturing cost advantage, said Mr B. B. Swain, Secretary, Ministry of MSME. Addressing the inaugural session of MSME Conclave organized by EEPC India yesterday, Mr Swain said that for the MSMEs to achieve high growth the two most significant interventions required are related to credit assistance and technology upgradation. He noted that the Ministry of MSME has been working closely with other Ministries and Departments to facilitate the ease of doing business for MSMEs.

“The Atma Nirbhar announcements have focused on easing access to registering as MSMEs, easing their access to credit and providing them the much needed protection as far as global tenders are concerned,” Mr Swain said. He informed the participants that MSMEs engaged in manufacturing of engineering products are about 29% of the 67 lakh MSMEs which have registered since 1st July, 2020 on the Udyam registration portal. “MSME units are together capable of constituting a complete supply chain and being globally competitive because of their diverse products ranging from intermediate to final products,” Mr Swain said.

In his welcome address, EEPC India Chairman Mr Mahesh Desai said that MSMEs need to catch up a lot on the technological front as this is crucial to increase India’s share in the global value chain. “Make-in-India initiative has brought ample scope for the Indian MSMEs to work with the large scale global manufacturing firms and get access to their upgraded technology and efficient marketing techniques. Following the onset of the pandemic, large corporations in the developed world have been looking at India as an alternative destination for manufacturing,” Mr Desai said. He noted the crucial role of MSMEs in the economy saying that the sector contributes around 30% to India’s GDP and has 50% share in the country’s exports. “The significance of the MSME sector in India has long been recognized and its potential has also been identified. In the National Manufacturing Policy, manufacturing output has been targeted to increase to 25% of GDP,” he stated.

EEPC India, with nearly 60% of its members coming from the MSME sector, has been playing an instrumental role in developing the engineering MSMEs of India. It has been working closely with the government to promote the MSMEs producing engineering products and in line with the initiative of the Department of Commerce for technological upgradation, set up two technology centers in Bengaluru and Kolkata to address the problem of technological backwardness of the engineering MSMEs.

“We promise our best endeavor towards higher integration of this sector in the global value chain through continuation of our strategic activities for the upgradation of engineering MSMEs and we believe that such summits fully dedicated for MSMEs will help us to achieve our goal,” said Mr Desai.

A Knowledge Paper titled ‘Integrating Indian MSMEs to Global Value Chain’ was also released in the inaugural session of the Conclave. The paper has suggested that India’s trade regime should promote value addition in the country. “Hence, the general tariff structure should be low on raw and primary goods, slightly higher on intermediaries and the highest on final products,” it said.

It further recommended that both direct and indirect tax structure should be neutral and not discriminate between the nature of firms. “Banks and the financial institutions should be more willing to discern genuine exporters and demand less of collateral. Finally, stability in policy measures with less intervention and emphasis on neutrality on behalf of the government will be necessary,” it listed among some of the broad pointers.

Ministry of Micro,Small & Medium Enterprises Press Release dated 20 Jan 2022

Judicial updates -21st January 2022

SC in G.T. Girish Vs Y. Subba Raju (D) By LRs judgment dated 18th Jan 2022 held that Subordinate Legislation in the form of Statutory Rules is a ‘law’ u/s 23 of Indian Contract Act


Matter involving large scale State Revenues should be disposed speedily Dalmia Refractories Limited Vs State of Tamil Nadu (Madras High Court) dated 11/01/2022


One Time Settlement (OTS) of Bank Loan is Not a Right of Borrowers held by SC in
matter of Bijnor Urban Cooperative Bank Limited dated 15/12/2021


SEBI impose penalty for dealings in illiquid Stock Options at the BSE In Re Ashok Kumar Sharma HUF (SEBI) -23/12/2021


Taxation

Rajasthan HC disposes Plea seeking extension of due dates till portal Glitches removed

Tax Bar Association Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) dated 12/01/2022

If AO accepts objections of assessee and does not assess or reassess the income which was the basis of notice than he cannot made additions on other issues

Yashoda Shivappa Nagangoudar Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) dated 05/01/2022

Provisional custom duty paid by Assessee cannot be treated as deposit

Nirma Ltd Vs C.C.-Jamnagar(prev) (CESTAT Ahmedabad) dated 13/01/2022

Bombay HC in Vodafone Idea Ltd. Vs ACIT dated 03/01/2022 held-

Reopening of Assessment not permissible to take another view on same material

For legal updates

https://chat.whatsapp.com/KHDvQUZa8yVJXElnuRT8xf

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1994228650711964/?ref=share

Regards,

Bipul Kumar

Tribunals/Quasi-Judicial Bodies

In India, Tribunals are a part of the Executive branch of the Government which are assigned with the powers and duties to act in judicial capacity for settlement of disputes. Part XIV of the Constitution of India makes provisions for establishment and functioning of the Tribunals in India. They are quasi-judicial bodies that are less formal, less expensive and enable speedy disposal of cases.

There are tribunals for settling various administrative and tax-related disputes, including Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), National Green Tribunal (NGT) and Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), among others. Tribunals were added in the Constitution by Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 as Part XIV-A, which has only two articles viz. 323-A and 323-B. Article 323A provides that a law made by the parliament may provide for establishment of an Administrative Tribunal for the Union and a separate Administrative Tribunal for each state or two or more states. Article 323 B empowers the parliament or state legislatures to set up tribunals for matters other than those mentioned under Article 323A.

Types of Tribunal in India

1. Debt recovery Tribunal

The Debt Recovery Tribunals have been constituted under Section 3 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions (RDDBFI) Act, 1993. The original aim of the Debts Recovery Tribunal was to receive claim applications from Banks and Financial Institutions against their defaulting borrowers. (DRT) was established for expeditious adjudication and recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions in order to reduce the non-performing assets of the Banks and Financial Institutions. Prior to the introduction of Debt Recovery Tribunal, petitions had to be filed separately for adjudication of cases and execution proceedings in different courts depending upon their jurisdiction. DRT acts as a single judicial forum for adjudication of cases as well as execution of the decrees passed for recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions under RDDBFI Act and Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests (SARFAESI) Act, 2002.

2. National Company law

Tribunal National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is a quasi-judicial body exercising equitable jurisdiction, which was earlier being exercised by the High Court or the Central Government. It has been established by the Central government under section 408 of the Companies Act, 2013 with effect from 1st June 2016. The Tribunal has powers to regulate its own procedures. The establishment of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) consolidates the corporate jurisdiction of the following authorities:

i)Company Law Board


ii) Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction.

iii) The Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction

iv) Jurisdiction and powers relating to winding up restructuring and other such provisions, vested in the High Courts.

3. Consumer Forum

To protect the rights of the consumers in India and establish a mechanism for settlement of consumer disputes, a three-tier redressal forum containing District, State and National level consumer forums has been set up. The District Consumer Forum deals with consumer disputes involving a value of upto Rs. 1 crore. State Commission has jurisdiction in consumer disputes having a value of upto Rs.10 crore. The National Commission deals in consumer disputes above Rs.10 crores, in respect of defects in goods and or deficiency in service. It is important to note that consumer courts do not entertain complaints for alleged deficiency in any service that is rendered free of charge or under a contract of personal service.

4. Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal (MACT) The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal deals with matters related to compensation of motor accidents victims or their next of kin. Victims of motor accident or legal heirs of motor accident victims or a representing Advocate can file claims relating to loss of life/property and injury cases resulting from Motor Accidents. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal are presided over by Judicial Officers from the State Higher Judicial Service and are under direct supervision of the Hon’ble High Court of the respective state.

5. Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)

Central administrative Tribunal is a multi-member body to hear on cases filed by the staff members alleging non-observation of their terms of service or any other related matters and to pass judgments on those cases. This Tribunal established in pursuance of the amendment of Constitution of India by Articles 323A.

6. National Green Tribunal (NGT)

National Green Tribunal was established for effective and expeditious disposal of cases relating to environmental protection and conservation of forests and other natural resources including enforcement of any legal right relating to environment and giving relief and compensation of damages to persons and property and for related matters.

7. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)

ITAT is a quasi judicial institution set up in January, 1941 and specializes in dealing with appeals under the Direct Taxes Acts. The orders passed by the ITAT are final, an appeal lies to the High Court only if a substantial question of law arises for determination.

Presently ITAT has 63 Benches at 27 different stations covering almost all the cities having a seat of the High Court