Faceless Penalty Scheme (CBDT Notification dated 27 May 2022)

CBDT Notification No. 54/2022/F. No. 370142/51/2020-TPL(Part III) dated 27 May 2022

S.O. 2425(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby makes the following Scheme to amend the Faceless Penalty Scheme, 2021, namely:__

CBDT Notification No. 55/2022/F. No. 370142/51/2020-TPL(Part III) dated 27 May 2022:

S.O. 2426(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2B) of section 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)(hereinafter referred to as ―the Act‖) and in consequence to the amendments made in section 144B of the Act vide the Finance Act, 2022, for the purposes of giving effect to the Faceless Penalty (Amendment) Scheme, 2022 made under sub-section (2A) of section 274 of the Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), Central Board of Direct Taxes published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary vide number S.O. 118(E), dated the 12th January, 2021, namely:

Bar of voting as per Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 on related parties operated only at the time of entering into a contract or arrangement  (SEBI Vs R.T. Agro Private Limited (Supreme Court) dated 25 April 2022)

APPELLANT: SEBI

RESPONDENTS: R.T. AGRO PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

Legal provisions:
188. Related party transactions   (1) Except with the consent of the Board of Directors given by a resolution at a meeting of the Board and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, no company shall enter into any contract or arrangement with a related party with respect to— (a) sale, purchase or supply of any goods or materials; (b) selling or otherwise disposing of, or buying, property of any kind; (c) leasing of property of any kind; ——————————————————— [Provided that no contract or arrangement, in the case of a company having a paid-up share capital of not less than such amount, or transactions exceeding such sums, as may be prescribed, shall be entered into except with the prior approval of the company by a Special resolution ( Resolution substituted by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 and is effective from 29th May, 2015.):   [Provided further that no member of the company shall vote on such [resolution], to approve any contract or arrangement which may be entered into by the company, if such member is a related party:]]

Having heard learned counsel for the appellant-Securities and Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’) and having perused the material placed on record, we find absolutely no reason to entertain this appeal.

The company R. T. Exports Limited proposed to enter into a transaction with one Neelkanth Realtors Private Limited for purchase of 40,000 sq. ft. of residential space. This proposal was treated as a related party transaction and was required to be approved by the shareholders of the Company. Accordingly, a special resolution was approved by R. T. Exports Limited on 15.07.2014. In terms of Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, the related parties abstained from voting on this special resolution. Thereafter, an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting was convened on 16.12.2016 for rescinding the resolution dated 15.07.2014 in which, the related parties also voted.

However, the appellant-SEBI took up the matter on a complaint and issued notice alleging violation of Regulation 23 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The Adjudicating Officer, ultimately, proceeded to penalise the present respondents 1 with a cumulative sum of Rs. 35 lakhs for the alleged violation of the said Regulation 23.

The Securities Appellate Tribunal has not approved this order passed by the Adjudicating Officer and has allowed the appeal filed by the present respondents while, inter alia, holding that the bar of voting as per Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 on related parties operated only at the time of entering into a contract or arrangement, i.e., when the resolution dated 15.07.2014 was passed; and therein the said related parties indeed abstained from voting. The Appellate Tribunal found no fault in the said parties voting in the recalling/rescinding of the said resolution.

The view, as taken by the Appellate Tribunal, in the given set of facts and circumstances of the present case, appears to be a plausible view of the matter. In fact, nothing of ill-intent on the part of the respondents has been established in the present case. The hyper-technical stance of the appellant could have only been, and has rightly been, disapproved on the given set of facts and circumstances.

The appeal fails and is, therefore, dismissed.

All pending applications stand disposed of.

Foreign Investment Facilitation Portal (FIF) completes 5 years since Union Cabinet decision to abolish FIPB. 853 FDI proposals disposed off in the last 5 years; FDI jumped by 39% since FIF came into being

853 FDI proposals have been disposed off through the Foreign Investment Facilitation Portal (FIF) since abolishment of Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). The proposal for abolition of FIPB was approved by the Union Cabinet in its meeting on 24th May, 2017. Subsequent to abolition of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), granting of government approval for foreign investment under the extant FDI Policy and FEMA Regulations was entrusted to the concerned Administrative Ministries/Departments and Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Ministry of Commerce & Industry, was made the nodal Department.

The FDI proposals were, thereafter, required to be filed only on Foreign Investment Facilitation Portal (FIF Portal) at https://fifp.gov.in, which is managed by DPIIT. The proposals filed on FIF Portal are forwarded to the concerned Administrative Ministry and are also simultaneously marked to Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) and Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for comments and to Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for necessary security clearance, wherever required as per the FDI Policy/ FEM Regulations.

A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for processing of FDI proposals, including documents to be filed, through FIF Portal was framed and laid down by DPIIT on 29th June, 2017 with amendment on 09th Jan, 2020.

Since then, not only the FDI has increased so have the number of countries bringing in FDI into India.  In FY 2014-15, FDI inflow in India stood at mere USD 45.15 billion, which increased to USD 60.22 billion in 2016-17 and further to the highest ever annual FDI inflow of USD 83.57 billion reported during the FY 2021-22 despite COVID-19 pandemic and recent Russia-Ukraine conflict. During FY 2021-22 FDI has been reported from 101 countries, whereas, it was reported from 97 countries during previous financial year (2020-21).

Automated alerts through SMS and emails to concerned ministries/ departments are being used to regulate pendency of FDI proposals. Secretary, DPIIT reviews the pendency of FDI proposals across all ministries / departments on monthly basis. This has expedited the disposal of FDI proposals. Regular training sessions are also being conducted to educate ministries/departments regarding judicious and expeditious processing of FDI proposal. 

Regular round table conferences are conducted with investors and law firms alike to keep abreast of the practical issues and problems being faced at the ground level. The FDI proposal form on FIF Portal is regularly reviewed to reduce compliance burden on applicants. FAQs have been updated and placed on DPIIT website and on FIF Portal for ease of access. Hence, continuous effort is made by DPIIT to ensure that India remains an investor friendly destination.

Press Release dated 24 May 2022

Strengthening NFRA & more control on Auditors In India

Report of The Company Law Committee (2022) recommends various changes to the Companies Act, 2013 to recognise new concepts, expedite corporate processes, improve compliance requirements, and remove ambiguities from existing provisions. The Report also includes recommendations to enable producer organisations to incorporate under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008.

The CLC has submitted its latest Report (2022) to the Government on 21st March, 2022 which has been placed on the website of the MCA.  It has been decided to invite comments/suggestions on the said Report from all the stakeholders through e-Consultation Platform on the MCA website till 06th May 2022.

One of the recommendations is  strengthening the national financial reporting authority by enhancing NFRA’s ability to take penal action against auditors, provision for dedicated NFRA fund, and  regulations making powers.

Section 132(1) of CA-13 empowers the Central Government to constitute the National Financial Reporting Authority (“NFRA”) for matters relating to accounting and auditing standards for companies.

NFRA seeks to protect public interest and the interests of investors, creditors and others associated with the companies or bodies corporate.

It has powers to investigate misconduct committed by any member or firm of chartered accountants registered under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949  i.e., it aims to ensure oversight over professionals in their audit and accounting related services to companies.

Sub-sections (3), (3A) and (3B) of Section 132 further provide the composition and manner of appointment of chairperson and members of NFRA.

Section 132(13) obligates NFRA to maintain books of accounts in the form prescribed by the Central Government in consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor General (“CAG”) of India.

While taking note of the provisions concerning NFRA, the Committee deliberated upon the autonomy of NFRA and its powers under CA-13.

In particular, this includes the NFRA’s ability to take penal action against auditors, have a dedicated NFRA fund, and make regulations.

(1) Penal action against companies and auditors for matters other than professional or other misconduct 

Section 132(4) of CA-13 provides that NFRA shall have the power to investigate matters of ‘professional or other misconduct’ committed by any member or firm of chartered accountants.

When such misconduct is proved, it can impose a penalty or debar the member or the firm from being appointed as an auditor or internal auditor or valuer under CA-13 or from undertaking an audit, internal audit and valuation under the Act.

The amount of penalty and period of debarment (both in the case of individuals and firms) has been provided under such provisions.

Professional or other misconduct has the same meaning assigned under Section 22 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which reads as under:

“For the purposes of this Act, the expression “professional or other misconduct” shall be deemed to include any act or omission provided in any of the Schedules, but nothing in this Section shall be construed to limit or abridge in any way the power conferred or duty cast on the Director (Discipline) under sub-section (1) of Section 21 to inquire into the conduct of any member of the Institute under any other circumstances.”

The First and Second Schedules under the Chartered Accountants Act,1949, contain matters that would be considered “professional misconduct” about chartered accountants in practice, chartered accountants in service, members of the Institute of Chartered

Accountants of India (ICAI) generally, and other misconduct about members of the ICAI generally.

The Committee discussed that NFRA does not have the powers to take actions against individuals and firms for non-compliance with CA-13 and requirements thereunder, which do not qualify as ‘professional or other misconduct’. In particular, it was informed that as per data with the MCA, approximately 11,000 auditors had not filed NFRA 2 – an annual return to be filed by auditors under Rule 5 of the NFRA Rules, 2018.

The Committee was accordingly of the opinion that NFRA should be empowered to take appropriate action against other contraventions in addition to its existing powers to take action against ‘professional or other misconduct’. There should also be specific provisions to enable NFRA to initiate appropriate penal action in case its orders are neither complied with nor any appeal against such an order has been filed in the NCLAT.

(2) Constitution of a NFRA fund

Currently, NFRA receives its funding entirely from the Central Government.

These funds are used for the

(a) salaries and allowances etc., for Chairperson, Members and other officers and employees of NFRA; and

(b) other expenses of NFRA connected with functions and purposes of NFRA under CA-13.

Given their specialised nature, regulatory authorities like NFRA require the necessary capabilities to discharge their functions.  The Committee deliberated the necessity for augmenting the degree of financial autonomy for NFRA.

The Committee was of the opinion that provisions concerning financial autonomy as is present for other regulatory bodies may also be incorporated for NFRA. For example, Section 222 of the IBC establishes the ‘Board Fund’, which is meant to meet the expenses of the IBBI. The Board Fund receives monies from all grants, fees received by the IBBI; all sums received from such other sources as decided by the Central Government; and such additional funds as may be specified by the IBBI or prescribed by the Central

Government.

Similarly, Section 51 of the Competition Act, 2002 establishes a Competition Fund, which receives monies from Central Government grants; fees received under the Act; and the interest accrued on the amounts received. It is used for the (a) salaries and allowances of

the Chairperson, Members, and officers of the Competition Commission, and (b) other expenses of the Commission in connection with the discharge of its functions and purposes under the Act.

The Committee was of the opinion that suitable amendments be made to CA-13 for the constitution of a NFRA Fund.

(3) Enabling NFRA to make regulations and granting supervisory powers to the NFRA Chairperson

Section 132 of CA-13 enables the Central Government to make Rules for the functioning of NFRA. For example, the Government has prescribed the (i) NFRA (Manner of appointment & other terms and conditions of service of Chairperson and Members) Rules, 2018; (ii) NFRA Rules, 2018; (iii) NFRA (Meeting for Transaction of Business) Rules, 2019; and (iv) NFRA (Recruitment, Salary, Allowances and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Secretary, Officers and other Employees of Authority) Rules, 2019. Presently, NFRA does not have any regulation-making powers under CA-13.

The Committee received suggestions that Section 132 may be amended to include enabling powers for NFRA to make regulations concerning certain matters. In this light, the Committee deliberated that when Section 132 was notified, it did not include regulation making powers. Any divergence would require due consideration. The Committee believed that certain regulation-making powers, sufficiently encumbered by checks and balances, may be given to NFRA.60 As such, the Committee thought it may be prudent to enable NFRA to make regulations in specific instances that shall be outlined in CA-13. This includes instances where autonomy is required for smoother internal functioning and instances that necessitate subject-matter expertise and immediate requirement for regulation.

The Committee thought granting such powers to NFRA would require accountability and good governance. In this regard, the Committee was apprised of the regulation-making powers of other regulators.

As particular examples, Section 52 of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008, which enables the concerned regulator to make regulations, is encumbered by Section 13 (4), which imposes checks and balances on the regulator by mandating consultations with all stakeholders and documenting and explaining all decisions.  

Similarly, Section 240 of the IBC enables the IBBI to make regulations.  Given good governance practices, IBBI has enacted the IBBI (Mechanism for Issuing Regulations) Regulations, 2018, which govern its regulation-making process and ensure accountability.

Other regulators, particularly the RBI, SEBI,  the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India,66 the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority,  also have regulation-making powers under the parent statute, albeit, with adequate safeguards.

Thus, the Committee recommended that NFRA should be enabled to make regulations for specific matters such as form and manner of filing information with NFRA, and place, timing, and procedure to be followed for meetings of the NFRA.

However, it discussed that in accordance with principles of good governance and accountability followed by the Central Government, such powers should be sufficiently encumbered with safeguards.

In keeping with the need for operational autonomy of NFRA, the Committee also deliberated the need to specify that the Chairperson shall have the powers of general superintendence, direction and control regarding administrative matters of NFRA. Similar provisions are included in Section 13 of the Competition Act, 2002  and Section 191 of the IBC.

It was thus of the opinion that Section 132 be suitably amended to provide the NFRA Chairperson with powers of general superintendence and direction within NFRA.

Note: Extract of Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013

The Companies Act, 2013

Chapter-IX Accounts of Companies

Section 132: Constitution of National Financial Reporting Authority.

132. (1) The Central Government may, by notification, constitute a National Financial Reporting Authority to provide for matters relating to accounting and auditing standards under this Act.

[(1A) The National Financial Reporting Authority shall perform its functions through such divisions as may be prescribed.]

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the National Financial Reporting Authority shall—

(a) make recommendations to the Central Government on the formulation and laying down of accounting and auditing policies and standards for adoption by companies or class of companies or their auditors, as the case may be;

(b) monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards and auditing standards in such manner as may be prescribed;

(c) oversee the quality of service of the professions associated with ensuring compliance with such standards, and suggest measures required for improvement in quality of service and such other related matters as may be prescribed; and

(d) perform such other functions relating to clauses (a), (b) and (c) as may be prescribed.

(3) The National Financial Reporting Authority shall consist of a chairperson, who shall be a person of eminence and having expertise in accountancy, auditing, finance or law to be appointed by the Central Government and such other members not exceeding fifteen consisting of part-time and full-time members as may be prescribed:

Provided that the terms and conditions and the manner of appointment of the chairperson and members shall be such as may be prescribed:

Provided further that the chairperson and members shall make a declaration to the Central Government in the prescribed form regarding no conflict of interest or lack of independence in respect of his or their appointment:

Provided also that the chairperson and members, who are in full-time employment with National Financial Reporting Authority shall not be associated with any audit firm (including related consultancy firms) during the course of their appointment and two years after ceasing to hold such appointment.

[(3A) Each division of the National Financial Reporting Authority shall be presided over by the Chairperson or a full-time Member authorised by the Chairperson.

(3B) There shall be an executive body of the National Financial Reporting Authority consisting of the Chairperson and full-time Members of such Authority for efficient discharge of its functions under sub-section (2) [other than clause (a)] and sub-section (4).]

(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the National Financial Reporting Authority shall—

(a) have the power to investigate, either suo motu or on a reference made to it by the Central Government, for such class of bodies corporate or persons, in such manner as may be prescribed into the matters of professional or other misconduct committed by any member or firm of chartered accountants, registered under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949:

Provided that no other institute or body shall initiate or continue any proceedings in such matters of misconduct where the National Financial Reporting Authority has initiated an investigation under this section;

(b) have the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters, namely:—

(i) discovery and production of books of account and other documents, at such place and at such time as may be specified by the National Financial Reporting Authority;

(ii) summoning and enforcing the attendance of persons and examining them on oath;

(iii) inspection of any books, registers and other documents of any person referred to in clause (b) at any place;

(iv) issuing commissions for examination of witnesses or documents;

(c) where professional or other misconduct is proved, have the power to make order for—

(A) imposing penalty of—

(I) not less than one lakh rupees, but which may extend to five times of the fees received, in case of individuals; and

(II) not less than [five lakh rupees], but which may extend to ten times of the fees received, in case of firms;

[(B) debarring the member or the firm from—

I. being appointed as an auditor or internal auditor or undertaking any audit in respect of financial statements or internal audit of the functions and activities of any company or body corporate; or

II. performing any valuation as provided under section 247,

for a minimum period of six months or such higher period not exceeding ten years as may be determined by the National Financial Reporting Authority.]

Explanation.—For the purposes of his sub-section, the expression “professional or other misconduct” shall have the same meaning assigned to it under section 22 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

(5) Any person aggrieved by any order of the National Financial Reporting Authority issued under clause (c) of sub-section (4), may prefer an appeal before [the Appellate Tribunal in such manner and on payment of such fee as may be prescribed.]

(6) [***]

(7)  [***]

(8)  [***]

(9)  [***]

(10) The National Financial Reporting Authority shall meet at such times and places and shall observe such rules of procedure in regard to the transaction of business at its meetings in such manner as may be prescribed.

(11) The Central Government may appoint a secretary and such other employees as it may consider necessary for the efficient performance of functions by the National Financial Reporting Authority under this Act and the terms and conditions of service of the secretary and employees shall be such as may be prescribed.

(12) The head office of the National Financial Reporting Authority shall be at New Delhi and the National Financial Reporting Authority may, meet at such other places in India as it deems fit.

(13) The National Financial Reporting Authority shall cause to be maintained such books of account and other books in relation to its accounts in such form and in such manner as the Central Government may, in consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India prescribe.

(14) The accounts of the National Financial Reporting Authority shall be audited by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India at such intervals as may be specified by him and such accounts as certified by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India together with the audit report thereon shall be forwarded annually to the Central Government by the National Financial Reporting Authority.

(15) The National Financial Reporting Authority shall prepare in such form and at such time for each financial year as may be prescribed its annual report giving a full account of its activities during the financial year and forward a copy thereof to the Central Government and the Central Government shall cause the annual report and the audit report given by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India to be laid before each House of Parliament.

LIST OF SECTIONS/RULES U/CA 2013 – REPLACING AFFIDAVITS WITH SELF-DECLARATION U/CA 2013 (The Company Law Committee Report)

1. Section 68(6) read with Rule 17(3), Companies (Share Capital and Debenture) Rules, 2014

Where a company proposes to buyback its shares/ securities under this section, an affidavit is required to be filed by two directors before the RoC and SEBI to the effect that the company will not be rendered insolvent for one year

2 Section 374(c)

Company registering under Chapter XXI Part I is required to file an affidavit from all members/ partners that in the event of registration, necessary documents or papers shall be submitted to the registering or other authority with which the company was earlier registered

3. Rule 7(4)(i), Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014

A company applying to convert into a One Person Company must apply for the RoC in the prescribed form. Such an application is required to be accompanied by an affidavit from the company’s directors confirming that all members and creditors of the company have given their consent for conversion.

4. Rule 8A(1)(j), Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014

A name including the phrase ‘Electoral Trust’ may be allowed for registration of companies to be formed under Section 8 of CA-13 following the Electoral Trusts Scheme, 2013, notified by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. For this purpose, the name application is required to be accompanied by an affidavit to the effect that the name obtained shall be only for registration of companies under the said scheme.

5. Rule 10(3)(b), Companies (Registration of Foreign Companies) Rules, 2014

Foreign companies must attach a translation of their documents, where such documents are not submitted to the RoC in English. Where the translation is done in India, it is required to be authenticated by an affidavit of a competent person, having adequate knowledge of both the original language and English, in the opinion of the RoC.

6. Rule 4(3)(iii), The Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016

An application for removal of the name of a company under Section 248(2) of CA-13 made to the RoC is required to be accompanied by an affidavit, in the prescribed form, by every director of the company.

Updates-07th March 2022

🖋️ Court room

SC Allows Insolvency Application Withdrawal as Majority Homebuyers accepted Builder’s Settlement during CIRP

Amit Katyal Vs Meera Ahuja (Supreme Court of India) dated 03/03/2022

Sale deed registration operate from the time from which it would have commenced to operate if no registration was required or made

Chitranshi Goyal Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Rajasthan High Court) dated 22/02/2022

Parties by agreement cannot give jurisdiction to a Court which lacks jurisdiction

Aanchal Mittal Vs Ankur Shukla (Delhi High Court) dated 25/02/2022

Summons for appearance & authorization for arrest under GST is not a Criminal Proceedings

Saurabh Mittal Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) dated 11/02/2022

Compounding Benefit under Income Tax cannot be denied for non-acquittal from Criminal Charges

Jai Singh Goel Vs Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) & Anr. (Delhi High Court) dated 25/02/2022

✒️ Laws-Act, Rule, Regulation,Notification, Circular etc.

LLP (2nd Amendment) Rules, 2022 dated 04th March 2022 (Clausewise analysis)

Auto-population of e-invoice details into GSTR-1 (GST Portal updates-03 March 2022)

✒️ Articles, News etc.

“Net Profit” calculation for CSR & Managerial remuneration II Net Profit as per Section 198 of CA 2013

ROC Adjudication order dated 03rd March 2022 for violation of 2nd proviso of Section 149(1) of CA 2013 (Non appointment of women director)

Exporter arrested for GST fraud case (Fraudulent ITC claim of Rs. 15.26 Cr.)-GST Updates -04-03-2022

ROC Adjudication order dated 03rd March 2022 for violation of 2nd proviso of Section 149(1) of CA 2013 (Non appointment of women director)

ROC Adjudication order dated 03rd March 2022 for violation of 2nd proviso of Section 149(1) of CA 2013 (Non appointment of women director)

Section reference As per Section 149 : Company to have Board of Directors.—(1) Every company shall have a Board of Directors consisting of individuals as directors and shall have— (a) a minimum number of three directors in the case of a public company, two directors in the case of a private company, and one director in the case of a One Person Company; and (b) a maximum of fifteen directors:

Provided that a company may appoint more than fifteen directors after passing a special resolution:

Provided further that such class or classes of companies as may be prescribed, shall have at least one woman director.

172. Penalty.— If a company is in default in complying with any of the provisions of this Chapter and for which no specific penalty or punishment is provided therein, the company and every officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees, and in case of continuing failure, with a further penalty of five hundred rupees for each day during which such failure continues, subject to a maximum of three lakh rupees in case of a company and one lakh rupees in case of an officer who is in default.]

BUDGET 2022 (Download all budget documents) -01st Feb 2022)

Key to Budget Document, 2022

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/Key_to_Budget_Document_2021.pdf

Budget Highlights (Key Features)

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/bh1.pdf

Annual Financial Statement
+

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#collapse2

Memorandum Explaining the Provisions in the Financial Bill

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/memo.pdf

Finance Bill

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/Finance_Bill.pdf

Statements of Fiscal Policy under the FRBM Act, 2003

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/frbm1.pdf

Output Outcome Framework for Schemes 2022-2023

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/OutcomeBudgetE2021_2022.pdf

Customs Notifications
+

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#custom

Implementation of Budget Announcements 2021-2022

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/impbud2020-21.pdf

Budget at a Glance
+

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#budget

Expenditure Profile
+

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#expen

Expenditure Budget

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#expenb

Ministry wise Summary of Budget Provisions

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/eb/sumsbe.pdf

All Statements of Budget Estimates

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/eb/allsbe.pdf

Finance Minister’s Speech

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/#collapse1